Tuesday, November 24, 2009

Why Afghanistan?

| 1 comments »


There's been much in the media about our War in Afghanistan--especially with Obama agonizing over "how many troops" to send. The media folks tell us that we should expect an answer next week. In my reading of the arguments, I came across the following article in the journal Commonweal (A Review of Religion, Politics and Culture). The article finishes with this quote:

If the United States today has a saving mission, it is to save itself. Speaking in the midst of another unnecessary war back in 1967, Martin Luther King got it exactly right:
“Come home, America.” The prophet of that era urged his countrymen to take on “the triple evils of racism, economic exploitation, and militarism.”
Dr. King’s list of evils may need a bit of tweaking—in our own day, the sins requiring expiation number more than three. Yet in his insistence that we first heal ourselves, King remains today the prophet we ignore at our peril. That Barack Obama should fail to realize this qualifies as not only ironic but inexplicable.

I don't have all the memories of the mid-1960's when LBJ was wrestling with a similar issue regarding the number of troops in Vietnam, but I have certainly read the history books and his decision, we all know now, was greatly flawed. I pray that Obama doesn't repeat history along the lines of LBJ.

I suspect that it is time for the next greatest generation to stand up and say NO to anymore military excursions halfway around the world. By the way, that generation are the young adults of today's Millennials. It's time to say NO, especially if you are a progressive--NO to War as the solution to the world's problems.


Take a look around and see what is happening to our nation and maybe it's time for another Peace Generation to rise up and tell our elders--you've got it wrong, once again!

Wednesday, October 07, 2009

So how wrong would it be to switch to the Republican party?

| 0 comments »

Today's St Pete Times has a front page article about Marco Rubio raising more than one million dollars for his US Senate campaign which forced me to think maybe I should switch parties for the 2010 primary election. Then I could vote for Rubio against Charlie Crist--thinking that the far right Rubio would be such a contrast to Kendrick Meek, that Meek could win the middle (where elections are won or lost most of the time anyway).

Yet, then it dawned on me, that Rubio could actually win the election (as Floridians refuse to vote for a black man for US Senate in 2010 as they refused to vote in 1968 for a white man--LeRoy Collins who just happened to walk alongside a black man--MLK at Selma, Alabama representing the President--LBJ in negotiating "peace" terms for blacks and police officers in the South). So, would Rubio be worse than Crist--absolutely, at least for Democrats and probably for Floridians.


Now, I know that many Republicans don't seem to really like Crist much these days--and who's to blame them. He is certainly Mr. Wishy-Washy! -- He runs for a political office just to get ready to run for the next political office--certainly not to actual "govern." But, if you check into what Rubio is saying, we might as well go backwards to the McCarthy years.

Bottom line, I think that Rubio would be such a contrast to Meek that it would be a clear choice for anyone to vote; but I also know how few voters get out to vote in the non-Presidential election years, even with a governor's race on the ballot.


Oh well, I guess I need to save up my pennies and get out my walking shoes and start to really hit the pavement for Kendrick Meek--I wonder, could this election be the Lawton Chiles campaign in 1970--a new face for Florida that took our state out of the old confederacy into the New South?

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Faithful Reform in Health Care - Home

| 0 comments »

Faithful Reform in Health Care - Home

Posted using ShareThis